Unwarranted generalizations

The underlying problem with liberals nowadays is that they're too stupid to recognize phrases beyond one word. They know what phrases like "peace," "love," "racism," "conservative," and "tolerance" mean, sure. These are liberal buzzwords that they use often.

But try to explain to them the meaning of a "free market" or "Evil Empire," and you've lost them. Say "compassionate conservatism" and they have a confused look on their face, but mention "reverse racism" and they quickly change their mood from confusion to absolute shock. Talk about the problem of "moral relativism" or "naive liberalism" and they go nuts; they've always thought they were "tolerant" and "moderate." Say you think Clinton's policies were "far fetched" and "disturbingly reckless," and they'll say no, they were "compassionate" and "empathizing."

When you try to counter that argument with a huge phrase like "the incalculable improbability of empathy or sympathy in a slyly acting greedy sleuth" like Bill Clinton, they'll start bawling because they simply don't understand. And that is what constitutes the problem with today's modern liberal: it's not that they are too "dumb" to debate your arguments, it's that they're too "convolutedly befuddled" to understand them.